Dear Ms. Portman:
Your letter to Neil Bibbins has been passed on to me. As you know, Lycos has been contacted by Daryl Kidd, who claims that portions of your Angelfire site, www.angelfire.com/ga2/portman/ are libelous. We have examined the site, and while it is clear that you and Mr. Kidd are embroiled in a serous dispute, frankly, I have no idea whether they are true or false. In addition, Lycos is not equipped to be, nor do we wish to be, the arbiter of disputes between users of its sites.
With that in mind, I have a proposal that will allow you to maintain your Angelfire Site if you remove some of the more inflammatory comments in the summary, as identified in part by Mr. Kidd. Again, I have no knowledge of whether these passages are libelous under the law. As a practical matter, however, your removal of these passages will address several arguments raised by Mr. Kidd and allow Lycos to avoid becoming directly involved in this dispute. The changes only relate to the summary of the case as contained at www.angelfire.com/ga2/portman/summary.html.
These are the only changes to the site that need to be made. Please understand that Lycos rarely involves itself in the editing of any Angelfire homepages, but we are trying to balance your interests with the interests of another user who claims that your site is libelous. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Brad Steiner, Lycos, Inc.
Corporate Counsel